Description and Creativity conference

Approaches to collaboration and value from anthropology, art, science and technology

A conference at King's College, Cambridge

3rd - 5th July 2005

OpeningPanel 1  -  Panel 2  -  Panel 3  -  Panel 4  -  Closing

Panel 1: Art/science collaborations

Monday July 4th, 9am - 1pm

Convenor James Leach

The ‘creative industries’ have a higher profile, and perceived worth, than ever before. Research Councils, Universities, and Government are all in the way of promoting novel interdisciplinary activity with the explicit goal of fostering creativity and nurturing new social and institutional forms to generate innovation. In this environment, what descriptions do we have available of creativity itself? How do different actors in these processes learn from one another, and what kinds of descriptions make knowledge of another practice or world available for use? How do translations of knowledge or approach retain value across domains? Collaboration: the quintessence of description as enabler?

Gron Tudor Jones

Complementary descriptions in 20th Century physics

Abstract:
A discussion of what was recently voted 'the most beautiful experiment in physics' - the interference of single electrons in a Young's double slit - will be used to introduce one of the deepest (and most disturbing) realizations of 20th century physics: (Bohr's) wave-particle complementarity.  It will be seen that this has forced physicists to change their ideas about causality and reality.

Bio:
Goronwy Tudor Jones, DSc FInstP, is a Reader in High Energy Physics at the University of Birmingham.  He established the Neutrino Physics Group which for about 20 years was involved in deep inelastic experiments at CERN in Geneva and Fermilab in Chicago, probing the quark-gluon substructure of neutrons and protons.  More recently he has been a member of the Heavy-Ion Physics group which hopes to study the properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma at the Large Haldron Collider at CERN in 2007.

He is the 'collaborating scientist' with the novelist Alan Wall in an ACE/AHRB Arts and Science Research Fellowship entitled 'Extremities of Perception: Imagery, Beauty and Understanding in Cosmo-Quark Physics'.

Alan Wall

Extremities of perception

Abstract:
This paper will look at how how radical pattern recognition and metaphor are at the root of much intellectual inventiveness. Thomas Young’s double-slit experiment will be the starting point. This will then be linked to verbal and visual metaphor, and the economies of thought (both scientific and artistic) with which we decode the world about us.

Bio:
Alan Wall is a novelist and short story writer. His books include Bless the Thief, The Lightning Cage, The School of Night, China and Richard Dadd in Bedlam. His volume of poetry Jacob was shortlisted for the Hawthornden Prize. He has taught at various universities and was for two years a Royal Literary Fund Fellow in Writing at Warwick and Liverpool John Moores. In 2003 he was awarded an AHRB/Arts Council Fellowship to research and write Extremities of Perception with the particle physicist Gron Tudor Jones. This book examines the sources of creativity in both science and art.

Alan Wall is Senior Lecturer in English and Creative Writing at University College Chester.

Alejandro Viñao

Asbtract: see below

Bio:
Born 4/9/1951, Buenos Aires, Argentina. British citizen since 1994.  Alejandro Viñao studied composition with the Russian composer Jacobo Ficher in Buenos Aires. In 1975 he moved to Britain where he continued his studies at the Royal College of Music and later at the City University in London where in 1988 he was awarded a Ph.D. in composition.

Viñao has received a number of international prizes and awards including the 'Golden Nica' Prix Ars Electronica (1992), 1st Prize at The International Rostrum at the Unesco World Music Council (1984) and many others.

Viñao's music has been played and broadcast throughout Europe and the U.S.A and has been featured in international festivals such as the Tanglewood Festival, the Warsaw Autumn Festival and the London PROMS.

He has received commissions from various performing groups and institutions around the world such as I.R.C.A.M, in France, MIT in the USA, the BBC Symphony Orchestra and  the Kronos quartet.

During the 80’s Viñao worked at Ircam at regular intervals and 1987 he was composer in residence at M.I.T. in the U.S.A.

In 1994 Alejandro Viñao was awarded the Guggenheim fellowship in composition. His piece Apocryphal Dances was premiered by the BBC Symphony Orchestra in London in 1997. The same year Viñao was invited to Japan to present his music in a Portrait Concert. Later that year, his chamber opera Rashomon was premiered in Germany. This work was commissioned by ZKM for the opening of their new building in Karlsruhe. Since then Rashomon has been produced in Paris, London and Gothenburg.

Following the success of his choral work Epitafios, Viñao was commissioned a new piece ‘La Trama’ for mixed choir  and computer by the German Sudwestrundfunk. This latest work was premiered in February 2003 by the SWR Vokalensemble Stuttgart.

Alejandro Viñao's music is characterised by the use of pulsed rhythmic structures to create large scale form, and by a melodic writing which -as in the case of much non-European music- develops through rhythm rather than harmony.

In addition to instrumental and Electroacoustic compositions he has also been involved with the creation of multimedia works, has composed music for some 20 films and produced several radio programmes for the BBC.

During 2004 Viñao was Research Fellow at the Music Faculty of Cambridge University.

See www.vinao.com

Ian Cross

Abstract: see below

Bio:
Initially a classical guitarist, since 1986 Ian Cross has taught and conducted research in music and science at the University of Cambridge where he is now Reader in Music & Science and a Fellow of Wolfson College. He has published widely, principally in the field of music cognition. At present, his main research focus is on the exploration of music as a biocultural phenomenon, involving collaboration with archaeologists, psychologists and engineers.

Cross and Viñao paper

CHANT D’AILLEURS: the unforeseeable adventure of Art and Science

This paper discusses the music composition Chant D’Ailleurs for soprano and computer by Alejandro Viñao which will be heard in the conference’s concert. Two central aspects of the piece are presented:

a)  The way in which the scientific concept and technological procedure of interpolation (sound morphing) inform the creative process, more specifically, the development of a new type of melodic discourse which forms the basis of the piece.

b)  The invention of an imaginary culture by the artist as a way of providing a coherent context for new ideas and techniques in music composition. For example, the imaginary language used in the 1st and 2nd movements of the piece will be presented as invention out of necessity: existing languages are not flexible enough to articulate the new melodic approach of the piece described in a).

Form this perspective, Chant d’Ailleurs illustrates how a scientific process coupled to a specific aesthetic speculation may produce an unforeseeable results such as the invention of an imaginary vocal tradition.

The paper will also consider some broad implications for relationships between art and science of AV's use of sound interpolation. It will suggest that in making use of a technologically enabled scientific description of physical world as a tool for artistic creation, AV poses problems for a set of sciences that are distinct from the science, acoustics, that underpins the technologies that he's using. Those sciences are the human sciences, and the problems that are posed concern the scientific description of the nature of human experience. It will be proposed that the relationship between art and science is inevitably cyclical and is better thought of in terms of relationships between arts and sciences, sciences which are mutually irreducible one to the other but are bound together through their mutual commensurability. The notion that the sciences are mutually irreducible may help to guarantee the irreducibility of art to science and offer a context for fruitful interaction between artists and scientists.

Tea/coffee break

Robert Whittle

Abstract: see below

Bio:
Research Reader at the University of Sussex, is a geneticist whose research over 30 years has concentrated upon cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying animal and human development, during the emergence of spatial patterns. More recently, he has become curious about possible reciprocal benefits from collaborations between artists and scientists, in particular to see whether the science base benefits from such exploratory practice. In 2003 he held a Leverhulme Research Fellowship to pursue depictions of developmental genetics in art and in the public understanding of science, and in 2003/4 was a participating scientist and manager of a Fellowship awarded by the AHRB/ACE to Heather Barnett for a project entitled Metamorphosis and Design. In 2000, he was a participating scientist in Invisible Body at the Atrium Gallery, London, after being a runner-up in the Wellcome Trust Sci-art competition in 1998. With support from the Wellcome Trust, he staged a science-art exhibition in 2002 for the British Society for Developmental Biology at their annual conference. In 2004 with a local poet, he conducted open-access creative writing workshops, funded by the city and the local NHS Trust in Brighton, on themes from the ‘new genetics’. This latter activity reflects his interest in the use of metaphor in portraying insights from science by scientists as well as by writers more generally.

Links: www.meta-art.info and http://www.zenadsl5348.zen.co.uk/ 

Heather Barnett

Abstract: see below

Bio:
Heather is a visual artist and researcher whose work explores the territories of art, science and technology, often in collaboration with science professionals and processes. Heather’s work is concerned with issues of society, technology and identity – with particular reference to medical science, interior space, and the limits of representation and recognition. Research projects include exploring issues of design within biological systems, the personal impact of surgical loss, physical intimacy and the doctor/patient relationship, and molecular identity through microbial and cellular portraiture. Heather has exhibited widely in the UK and abroad, and last year was commissioned by the Victoria & Albert Museum, London, for The Other Flower Show. Cultured Colonies (a photographic installation piece made in 2000) will be shown in Germany and Portugal later this year. She has been Artist in Residence in various settings including: Poole Hospital Pathology Department (2000), The National Botanic Garden of Wales (2001) and Infoterra: satellite imaging company (2002). Last year she was Research Fellow in Arts and Science (ACE/AHRB funded) at the University of Sussex exploring issues of Metamorphosis & Design with 4 research groups in Life Sciences. In addition to her art practice Heather also has considerable curatorial experience, and in 2000 brought contemporary art and medical science to a vast public audience by presenting Invisible Body at the Atrium Gallery, Whiteleys Shopping Centre in West London. She is also a regular Visiting Lecturer at universities across the country and has organised and facilitated numerous arts and film projects in gallery and community settings.

Links: www.heatherbarnett.co.uk www.meta-art.info

Whittle and Barnett abstract

Robert Whittle (fruit fly geneticist) and Heather Barnett (artist) recently collaborated on an AHRB/ACE funded science/art fellowship entitled Metamorphosis & Design. The project explored aspects of design and transformation in biological systems across four research groups that had different interest, within The School of Life Sciences at the University of Sussex. Notions of creativity, visualisation and description were of key interest to the project, both during the process of engagement with the scientists and in the final outcomes produced. In this presentation, Robert and Heather will share some observations of ‘creative acts’ from the perspectives of both science and art, through visual illustration, verbal description and live visual interpretation. The presentation itself will therefore be an experiment in ‘description and creativity’ across disciplines.

Palle Dahlstedt

DEFINING SPACES OF POTENTIAL ART
The significance of representation in computer-aided creativity

Abstract:
One way of looking at the creative process is as a search in a space of possible answers. One way of simulating such a process is through evolutionary algorithms, i.e., simulated evolution by random variation and selection. The search space is defined by the chosen genetic representation, a kind of formal description, and the ways of navigating the space are defined by the choice of genetic operators (e.g., mutations). In creative systems, such as computer-aided music composition tools, these choices determine the efficiency of the system, in terms of the diversity of the results, the degree of novelty and the coherence within the material. Based on various implementations developed during five years of research, and experiences from real-life artistic applications, I will explain and discuss these mechanisms, from a perspective of the creative artist.

Bio:
Palle Dahlstedt is a composer, performing artist and researcher, currently living in Göteborg, Sweden. He holds degrees in music composition from the Lund University and Göteborg University, and a PhD in computer-aided creativity from Chalmers University of Technology. His music ranges from piano improvisations to orchestral works, from electroacoustic music to interative computer works and electronica. He has won several international prizes and his music has been performed all over the world. Dahlstedt's current research interest is the application of evolutionary algorithms to the creative process. He is also a co-founding lecturer at the Art & Technology program at the Faculty of Applied Information technology, Chalmers University of Technology / Göteborg University. In 2003-2004 he was an Art & Science Research Fellow at the University of Liverpool, Dep. of Computer Science.

Home page: www.id.gu.se/palle

Discussants: Daniel Glaser and Roy Ascott

Bios:

Daniel Glaser is an imaging neuroscientist and Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London. He uses fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) to examine human brain function. This involves putting people into a powerful magnet to see which bits of the brain are active when they perform various tasks. He is particularly interested in top-down influences on low-level visual processing. This is how experience, prejudice and expectation alter the way we see the world. He's involved in a collaborative project with dance experts examining the connection between seeing and doing. How does being an expert in ballet change how you see ballet? He comes from an unusual academic background having studied maths and then English literature at Cambridge, doing a masters in cognitive science at Sussex University, and graduate work in neurobiology. In 2002 he was appointed 'Scientist in Residence' at the Institute of Contemporary Arts (ICA) in London. This was the first appointment of its kind at an arts institution. During his residency he collaborated with the ICA curators to put on talks, panel discussions, dance workshops and psychological experiments. He has made numerous appearances on national and local radio and has featured in articles in daily newspapers and on the Internet. Café Scientifique at the Photographers' Gallery which is the London branch of a national series providing a new way for scientists to interact with a general public. He was a judge on last year's Aventis Prize and is a NESTA cultural leadership awardee. He is the author and presenter of two one-hour documentaries for BBC4 & BBC2 on the daily practice of science currently in production.

 

Roy Ascott is Director of the Planetary Collegium <http://www.planetary-collegium.net>, Professor of Technoetics, University of Plymouth, and Adjunct Professor in Design|Media Arts at the University of California Los Angeles. Previous appointments include: Vice-President and Dean of the San Francisco Art Institute, California; Professor of Communications Theory, University of Applied Arts, Vienna; Chair of Fine Art, Minneapolis College of Art & Design; and President of the Ontario College of Art.

A pioneer of telematic art, Roy Ascott has shown at the Venice Biennale, Electra Paris, Ars Electronica Linz, V2 Holland, Milan Triennale, Biennale do Mercosul, Brazil, European Media Festival, and gr2000az, Graz, Austria. Originally a painter, he studied under Victor Pasmore and Richard Hamilton. His research is in art and the technology of consciousness. He is Editor of Technoetic Arts: a journal of speculative research , and serves on the editorial boards of Leonardo, Convergence, and Digital Creativity, He has advised new media centres and festivals in the UK, the US and Canada, Brazil, Europe and the Far East, as well as the CEC and UNESCO, and convenes the annual international Consciousness Reframed conferences.

His publications, translated into many languages, include: Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art Technology and Consciousness, University of California Press (2003); Technoetic Arts (Korean trans. Won-Kon Yi), Yonsei University Press, (2002); Reframing Consciousness, Intellect Books (1999); Art & Telematics: toward the Construction of New Aesthetics (Japanese trans. E. Fujihara), Tokyo: NTT Publishing (1998). Engineering Nature will be published by Intellect late 2005.

 Home  -  Theme  -  Panels  -  Concert